IMAGES AND WINE LABELS: A SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON THE RELATION BETWEEN DESIGN AND TERROIR

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59279/impact.v3i1.2575

Keywords:

Wine label, Semiotic, Visual communication

Abstract

This article aims to understand the wine label as a communicative bias not only between the consumer and the packaged content, but also with the producer and the territory where the drink is produced. For this, forty wine labels divided into two production poles were observed: twenty from the Old World and twenty from the New World. The research had as analytical support the semiotic dimensions of design, with emphasis on the territorial narratives apprehended from the semantic approach of the images contained in the labels. Through this, it was possible to argue that the notion of terroir generates new dynamics of meaning, with the Old World tactic of using the image of the place or of the process elements as a possibility of transporting the consumer, while the New World accentuate technical attributes such as stamps, coins and coats of arms to confirm quality.

Author Biography

Ana Carolina de Moraes Andrade Barbosa, Dr.a, UFPE - CAA

Professora Permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Design da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE). Professora Adjunta do Curso de Design do Campus do Agreste da UFPE, Doutora pelo PPG Design da UFPE, Mestre em Desenvolvimento Urbano pela mesma instituição e Designer formada na Universidade Federal de Campina Grande. Atualmente é Coordenadora do Núcleo de Design e Comunicação da UFPE/CA e coordena pesquisa e extensão nas áreas que relacionam design com cultura, cidades, produção artesanal e território. Autora do livro: Imagem, Paisagem e Situação: uma apreensão do design na cidade

Published

2024-03-10

How to Cite

de Siqueira Leite, P. H., & de Moraes Andrade Barbosa, A. C. (2024). IMAGES AND WINE LABELS: A SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS BASED ON THE RELATION BETWEEN DESIGN AND TERROIR. MPACT rojects, 3(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.59279/impact.v3i1.2575

Issue

Section

03. IMPACTO SOCIOECONÔMICO